Mishkan ha-Echad

Saturday, 26 July 2008

Gnostic Parallels In The Qabalah


As a student of both Gnosticism and Qabalah, I began to find many similarities between the two, and wondered just how deep the parallels went. Indeed, it made me question if the Qabalah was influenced by Gnosticism, which even the Qabalistic scholar Gershom Scholem wondered in his many excellent books on the subject. It seems likely that this is so, at least in the Lurianic school of Qabalah, but for now I will content myself with merely pointing out the parallels and letting my readers come to their own conclusions.

  1. God is conceived of as beyond the Three Negative Veils of Existence, (Limitless Light, Limitless, and Nothing), as the Unmanifest, in the Qabalah. Likewise it was common Gnostic principle (as well as being a general approach in mysticism as a whole [see the Cloud of Unknowing, for example]) to define God in negative terminology.
  2. While the above is true, God was also seen as part and parcel of the entire manifest universe, while also being beyond the Three Negative Veils. This is called panentheism, believing the universe to be part of God, but not all of God, which is in stark contrast to pantheism. Of course, there were many Gnostics who claimed definitively that the world was not in the least bit divine, but there were also many others who believed otherwise - the Valentinians in particular. They shared a predominantly panentheistic view. This can also be found in the Qabalah, where God is present in all the Sephiroth, and yet there is also part of him that is Unmanifest, beyond the Veils.
  3. The process of emanation in the creation process ("emanationist cosmogony") is part and parcel of, at the very least, Sethian and Valentinian belief. It is a typical point that, in a sense, defines Gnosticism (though, of course, not all Gnostics adhered to this, but this is pushing the term to its most open and inclusive). At the very least, the Sethians are the only group to actually call themselves Gnostics, and since they believed this, it is the most definitive source, in terms of scholarship, for defining the belief. The Qabalah shares this cosmogony, with emanating Sephiroth instead of Aeons. Indeed, the Aeons often numbered 10, the number of the Sephiroth.
  4. God of the Manifest Universe, either seen in Chokmah or Kether, is not the "real God" - you see a beared man in Chokmah (traditional "man in the clouds" god), or a bearded man in profile in Kether, showing you can only see one side of God. This is very similar to the conception of God throughout Gnostic myth, with the God of Chokmah or Kether (depending on your source and personal inclination), who is the "Creator God", being equated as the Demiurge.
  5. Gnosticism espouses a belief in a Divine Spark in Man. Qabalah also espouses this belief (via the Yechidah, etc.). See here and here for Qabalistic passages by the Baal Shem Tov on the Divine Sparks.
  6. Gnosticism teaches us that this world is a fallen one (sometimes likened to a prison, which the Qabalists would not necessarily have agreed with), with the Divine Sparks trapped inside. It must be raised up and restored to its original condition. This is a pivotal belief in the Qabalah, which focus on the Tiqqun ha-Olam, the Restoration of the World. This usually takes the form of Malkuth being fallen and requiring reunion with Tiphareth (see here for my Qabalistic Cross material on Tiqqun as an illustration of this).
  7. There is a feminine form of Divinity in Gnosticism, which is termed Sophia. The Qabalistic equivalent, often used by many modern Gnostics, is the Shekinah. Sophia was once one of the primary emanations, but has now become trapped in the physical. This is mirrored in the Qabalah, where Sophia (or Barbelo in her higher Sethian aspect) lies in Binah, but her fallen counterpart lies in Malkuth. Interestingly enough, Sophia is Greek for "Wisdom," while Chokmah is Hebrew for "Wisdom". Some Qabalists would attribute the Demiurge to Chokmah (while others will choose Kether or even Chesed), and the Demiurge is typically linked to Saturn, which is attributed to Binah. Thus we have a kind of reversal of attributions of Sophia and Demiurge between these two Sephiroth in the Qabalah.
  8. The most important principle about Gnosticism is Gnosis, experiential knowledge of the Divine. While the Qabalah does not have a direct equivalent, Gnosis is usually translated as "Knowledge", with a potential equivalent being the Hebrew Da'ath, also translated at "Knowledge". To access the Supernal Realm the Qabalist must peruse Da'ath, or, to put it another way, Gnosis allows us to experience the heights of Divinity. This is a fundamental hidden principle to Qabalah.

These are but a few of the parallels I've found between these two systems, which, as both a Gnostic and a Qabalist, have allowed me to use them together without contradiction (and have allowed me to explain Qabalistic ideas in Gnostic terms, or Gnostic ideas in Qabalistic terms). There are many more parallels, including the Sepher Yetzirah and Sepher ha-Bahir. I will be exploring these in a more indepth article on this matter in the future.

8 comments:

Michael Gorsuch said...

Excellent notes, Dean.

I had always considered Hermeticism to be 'gnostic' in the simplest sense, meaning that it provided methods for direct knowledge.

But - I was astonished when I read Stephen Hoeller's Gnosticism: New Light on the Ancient Tradition of Inner Knowing and saw so many parallels in the Sophia story to the idea of emanations on the Tree of Life.

While the terms vary and traditional Gnosticism certainly implies that the physical world is a prison, I find it hard to believe that ideas weren't exchanged in the distant past. Or, perhaps the originators were inspired by similar sources.

I'd like to read more from you, as I've been curious how someone who comes from a Gnostic background reconciles things with the Hermetic view.

Frater Yechidah said...

Ave Michael,

I once argued with someone about the possibility that Hermeticism came from Gnosticism, and it got me into a lot of trouble. I have since settled with the notion that it is a sister tradition to Gnosticism, both of which saw their height in Greek Alexandria in roughly the Second Century CE. Indeed, the fact that Nag Hammadi included some Hermetic texts suggests a link in concepts, if not historical.

I don't see the idea of the world as a prison as that contradictory to Qabalistic teaching, to be honest. If we are fallen sparks of God, then we need to rise up again. The prison is, therefore, ignorance - not knowing that we contain Sparks of Divinity. This is how I view this element of Gnosticism likewise.

If you have any specific areas of Hermetic teaching you'd like me to address, feel free to point them out. Otherwise I don't know where to begin!

Thanks for the comment :)

LVX,
Dean.

Michael Gorsuch said...

Dean - thanks for shedding the light on the Gnostic prison metaphor and Hermeticism. That certainly seems compatible.

How do you reconcile the ideas of the Demiurge and the Archons?

Frater Yechidah said...

Ave Michael,

There's a lot to the metaphor of imprisonment, but many Gnostics, old and new, would see the primary element of that as ignorance (which comes from the word "gnosis", and, with the negative prefix would mean "without gnosis"). Some, of course, would have taken it a little more literally, however.

As for the Demiurge and Archons, they can be seen in multiple ways. They are mythological constructs to represent the forces of ignorance, bondage, death, temptation, and all other manners of "sin" and so forth. They are externalisations of psychological battles, of our own battle with ignorance, bondage, etc. They are also planetary forces, which I discussed in a post on my Gnostic blog:

http://henosis-decanus.blogspot.com/2008/05/archons-as-planetary-forces-many.html

Check out that post, as it explores one way of reconciling the Archons (with the Demiurge as Saturn) with Hermetic teaching and philosophy.

LVX,
Dean.

Michael Gorsuch said...

Thanks for that article, as it certainly makes certain links.

Where would you recommend a novice go to learn more of the various Gnostic traditions? I have read a few pieces in the past, but have always felt that it is even more open ended than Hermeticism!

I am assuming that it is much like Hermeticism in that the real learning comes from personal action. I am interested in learning more, as your writing is opening my mind on the subject. I had come to the conclusion that Gnosticism shunned the world of flesh, and had therefore considered it to be incompatible with most Qabalistic thought.

Frater Yechidah said...

Ave Michael,

Firstly, check out the other posts on my Henosis Decanus blog. Here are a few that deal with asceticism:

http://henosis-decanus.blogspot.com/2007/02/on-denying-body.html

http://henosis-decanus.blogspot.com/2008/03/asceticism-why-starving-is-bad-for-you.html

http://henosis-decanus.blogspot.com/2008/04/jesus-on-asceticism.html

I also recommend checking out the blog links on Henosis Decanus, as they are all by modern Gnostics, most of whom are not world-hating. These are, in particular, quite good:

http://egina2.blogspot.com/

http://eighthsermon.blogspot.com/

http://www.palmtreegarden.org/blog/

Also check out the Palm Tree Garden forum, where many of us Gnostic converge for discussion:

http://www.palmtreegarden.org

The Apostolic Johannite Church are a great group to look into too. Read their mission statement for an idea of what a modern Gnostic church looks like:

http://www.johannite.org/

As for books, get a copy of "The Gnostic Bible" and read the actual Gnostic texts themselves. Gnosticism can be a very broad term, so this huge book gives you a great overview of many of its distinct branches (world-hating and world-loving alike).

And, of course, feel free to ask more questions here. I'll probably do more posts about Gnostic links in other aspects of the occult in the future.

LVX,
Dean.

Anonymous said...

Old post, but still, the main issue we have with classic gnostics and even lurianic Kabbalah which I have found through revelation to be a falsehood is a negative outlook on the Good, the Source is ultimately Good and in control, He could have turned the lights out on us a long while ago...it is what it is, nature itself is not inherently evil, mankind is the only creature on earth with the ability to be evil, this stems from our freedom of choice, at the end of the day this world is a forging ground, a test, you either pass or fail. But if he pass how great the wonder shall be. yaNur.

MrXYZ said...

Hey Dean,
I was just thinking about God in Gnosticism. Wouldn't this separate the God in Gnosticism from Kabbalah(the Jewish form) who is upheld by Judaism?
Also, would Jesus then be Adam Kadmon as a restorer in Lurianic Kabbalah?
Dominic

Support the Blog

If you enjoyed this content and would like to see more of it, or would like to buy me a cup of tea as a thank you, make a donation through Kerubim Press by clicking the button below.

Thank you! Your support and patronage is much appreciated!